Raj Bhimani played a very nice program on Saturday afternoon.
Preludes, Book 1 (1910) – Claude Debussy (1862–1918)
I. Dancers at Delphi (I’ll be using the English translations)
II. Sails/Veils
III. Wind on the Plain
IV. “Sounds and Fragrances Turn in the Night Air”
V. The Hills of Anacapri
VI. Footsteps in the Snow
VII. What the West Wind Saw
VIII. The Girl with the Flaxen Hair
IX. The Interrupted Serenade
X. The Sunken Cathedral
XI. Puck’s Dance
XII. Minstrels (the same in French and English)
I. Dancers at Delphi (I’ll be using the English translations)
II. Sails/Veils
III. Wind on the Plain
IV. “Sounds and Fragrances Turn in the Night Air”
V. The Hills of Anacapri
VI. Footsteps in the Snow
VII. What the West Wind Saw
VIII. The Girl with the Flaxen Hair
IX. The Interrupted Serenade
X. The Sunken Cathedral
XI. Puck’s Dance
XII. Minstrels (the same in French and English)
Océanides (1988) – Thérèse Brenet (1935– )
Sonata in C Minor, D. 958 (1828) – Franz Schubert (1797–1828)
Since
the music of Debussy and others of his era is often called
‘impressionistic,’ I’m going to offer impressions of the individual
preludes. Debussy wrote two books of twelve each, and while there’s no
suggestion that they’re made to be played all together, there are
precedents, so that’s what we heard here.
I.
Slow opening, slightly mesmerizing, finished with a solid major chord;
II. Introducing more ‘impressionistic’ flourishes, still with some
repetitive rhythms and touches of orientalism, as well; III. Ripples of
notes, plus some explosive phrases, fade away to nothing; IV. Definitely
impressionistic, but more of a sense of romance and sensuality, with
some angularity thrown in; V. Moody opening, jaunty tunes, what felt
like a bit of a dance, finishing in the upper registers of the keyboard;
VI. Quietude, calm but not somber—even though there was a range of
dynamics, gave an impression of muffled sound; VII. Arpeggiated lower
range wind, then with stronger gusts—good range of dynamics, harsh at
times, written to be very powerful—sudden ending; VIII. Tuneful,
recognizable to me (probably to a lot of you, too [Girl with the Flaxen
Hair]), gentle but still varied dynamically and in sentiment; IX. Very
rhythmic, choppy opening, short, calmer interludes—bouncing back and
forth between themes/phrases, jolly little ending; X. Gentle, somewhat
mysterious sounding, then on to a dramatic louder section, thick
prominent block chords, then a retreat to the calmer sounds; XI. Lively,
rhythmic—at one point, busy left hand with the right hand providing
repetitive rhythmic accompaniment, light fun ending; XII. Rhythmic and
dancelike, phrases repeated, but with some shaking up, surprisingly
tonal ending.
Well,
those are my impressions—literally the notes I wrote to myself during
the performance. I hope they made an impression on you.
Océanides
was a piece written for the left hand alone; very often, pieces are
commissioned for the left hand alone, especially if a pianist has lost
the use of a right arm or hand.
Beginning
in the extreme lower register of the piano, the piece uses the pedals
quite a bit, in order to create a wash of sound and to let the left hand
provide both accompaniment and melody/chords. The very modern harmonies
were slightly harsh at times. There was also a march-like
section—sounding like actual marching. While the piece used interesting
composition and performance techniques, it didn’t really speak to me in the
long run.
The
Schubert sonata was, to my ears, all in all a heavy work, with its
themes and constant hints of darkness; heavy, without being ponderous.
The
first movement had a very dramatic opening, then a tuneful section that
also included lots of chords. A shift to a dance-like section
incorporated a large variety of themes and sections, still with a sense
of drama, even in the quieter sections. It seemed almost overstuffed, to
me. The second started with what seemed to be a song or chorale. There
were pretty tunes; it was sort of like a collection of dark, dramatic
songs.
The
third movement had a rippling accompaniment, still with a dark
undercurrent, even in the rapid finger work passages. There was finally a
touch of brightness, even though it stayed in a minor key and still
with a sense of drama. The final movement was very dramatic and almost
frantic at times. It too had that slightly overstuffed feeling as in the
first movement. I liked it, even with the heaviness and darkness. I
didn’t realize until checking the program and the dates that it was
written in the last year of Schubert’s short life. Maybe there’s a
reason for that heaviness and darkness.
Mr.
Bhimani played the entire concert from memory and did a great job. His
control of the dynamics and flow of the entire concert was very good—as
in, you weren’t aware of the technique and ebb and flow while it was
happening, and that’s a good thing.
ConcertMeister