Ulysses and Emerson Quartets
Sort of. It was neither orchestral nor was it double quartets.
Richard Strauss (1864-1949), Sextet from Capriccio,
Op. 85, (1942) (performed by the Ulysses Quartet with Lawrence Dutton,
viola and Paul Watkins, cello)
Anton Bruckner (1824-1896), String Quintet in F major, WAB 112, (1878-79)III.
Adagio, G-flat major, common time (performed by the Emerson String Quartet
with Colin Brookes, viola)
Dmitri Shostakovich (1906-1975), Two Pieces for String Octet, Op.
11, (1924-25)
1. Adagio; 2. Allegro molto
(performed with the Ulysses Quartet playing the first parts)
Felix Mendelssohn, (1809-1847), Octet in E-flat major, Op. 20, (1825)
1. Allegro moderato ma con
fuoco (E-flat major); 2. Andante (C minor); 3. Scherzo: Allegro leggierissimo (G minor); 4. Presto (E-flat major)
(For
the record, I copied the program from their website. The key signatures for the
Octet mean very little to me. But I liked the work a lot.)
Here’s the deal. This was a program
featuring two string quartets. But we never heard two string quartets. The
first work was a sextet—the Ulysses quartet with two guests. To me, it was airy
but with a rich sound. It added drama by way of increased energy. It was rather
moody, and somewhat subdued as a (metaphorical) curtain raiser.
The second work was one movement of a string quintet, played by the Emerson quartet plus a guest. Seeing a pattern yet? The
work was slow and sweet, while also a bit somber. The harmonies were on the
dense side, deeper and fuller (though the real-life chirping birds—hey, it was
an outdoor concert), were a nice touch. It was pleasant, if somewhat staid.
The first movement of Shostakovich’s
first piece for octet had an energetic opening before settling down. There were
a few dissonances, but nothing at all harsh, with an interesting mix of slower
and faster tempos. The second movement was very energetic, after a brief
opening, leaning toward more modern harmonies (though nothing overly dramatic).
The movement ended with a nice flourish.
The Mendelssohn octet. Ah! It was
written when he was sixteen. (Yes, it was edited later, but the exuberance of a
sixteen-year-old fills the piece.) Daylight was fading during this last work of
an outdoor concert, so scribblings will ensue.
(i) Bubbly, youthful exuberance, while
also being nuanced. There were several returns to the opening motifs, which
were developed along the way.
(ii) (After a quick re-tuning) A lovely and slightly tugging-at-the-heartstrings
(in a good way) feeling, plus some drama involved, as well, and hope, too, was followed
by a subtle ending.
(iii) Lots of energy! Even though it was in a minor key, the feeling of hope
just can’t be tamped down, especially including the clever ending to the
movement.
(iv) Even more energetic, with a brisk cello opening; then everyone is pretty
much off to the races. They were having a great time of it—oh, sure, they took
the occasional breather—but the energy never flagged.
ConcertMeister