Sunday, February 23, 2025

Gotham Early Music Scene (2/20/25)

Hesperus – O Italia! Celebrating the Codex Faenza 

Tina Chancey ~ director, vielles, rebec & menj; Barbara Hill ~ voice & percussion; Dan Meyers ~ recorders, douçaines & percussion; Cameron Welke ~ lute 

Bel fiore dança – Anonymous
De tout flors – Guillaume de Machaut (1300–1377)
Hont’ par – Guillaume de Machaut
Non ara m’a pietà – Francesco Landini (1325/1335–1397)
Jay grant désespoir – Anonymous
De ce fol penser – Pierre de Molins (fl. 14th c.)
Ecco la primavera – Francesco Landini
Contantia – Anonymous
Benedicamus – Anonymous
Or su, vous dormés trop – Anonymous

Boy, Anonymous was a very prolific composer. I know I have sung Machaut; I may have sung Landini; I think this is the first time I've ever heard of de Molins. And I had to look up fl. again – it means flourished, i.e., flourished in the 14th century. You will most likely never need to remember that again.

On to the instruments. A rebec is a sort of scratchy violin wannabe; a vielle is an early wannabe cello; a menj is ... I don't know (and the internet has not been helpful at all). The layout of columns in the church and the very tall man who plopped down in the pew in front of me moments before the concert started meant that I could not see the vielles, rebec & menj player. The douçaine is a reed instrument (oboe-esqe) that sounded more squeaky than sweet to me.

The music was a nice mix of rebec, recorder, lute, vielle, and percussion as well as lute, douçaine, and percussion. Voice was added in several pieces. The music varied between gentle, dance-like, energetic, jaunty, etc. Ecco la primavera was scored for lute, vielle, recorder, and voice. It was very energetic and included finger cymbals! At one point, the recorder player also played a mouth harp. This piece was a major crowd pleaser.

A note on the Codex. The Faenza Codex was a collection of 14th-century pieces. Sort of a mish-mash that included 52 Italian and French secular works. Can we believe that story? Maybe. Maybe not.

The group Hesperus had been featured on the NYC classical station WQXR recently. As a result, attendance was quite a bit larger than the regular Thursday series concerts. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but it might have led to the tall person who plopped down in front of me moments before the concert started.

Oh, I thoroughly enjoyed the concert. And the concerts are free.

ConcertMeister


Wednesday, February 19, 2025

Across a Crowded Room (2/15/25)

Final Presentations of New Musicals

Well, not exactly final. As some of you readers may know, this is a series of 20-minute musicals. The Lincoln Center Library for the Performing Arts throws wannabe bookwriters, composers, and lyricists (sometimes some being more than one) into a room—the Bruno Walter Auditorium—where they meet, greet, and match up, to lead to the challenge of creating a 20-minute musical. The results are ... interesting.

I saw eight this past Saturday, and they ranged from less than fun to really fun. As we all know, I'm not a reviewer, so I'll give titles and impressions.

Twenty Nickels had a good hook (the last Horn & Hardart in Philly – ask if you don't know) and the twenty minutes spanned three generations of women and two generations of loss. It was quite effective.

Big breath, please. The Most Depressing Play in the Western Canon of Dramatic Literature: A Presentation in Musical Form for Mr. Clinton's World Theatre Elective on the Topic of Censorship in the Matter of Henrik Ibsen's 1881 Play Ghosts, Written and Performed by Group 2: Craig, Jen, Billy, and Metz. The show was fun, and the four performers glommed right into teens pretending to have read Ibsen's Ghosts. Fun, but not great.

Next was Ghost/Writer. A two-hander, this was the tale of a writer (with a block) and a real ghost (or was she?) who got the writer through the block. Both the writer and the ghost were happy with the ending, as was I.

Another long title (I'm not particularly liking this trend). BILL OF FARE or: The Possibly True Reconstructed History of the Many Menus of Miss Francis E. Buttolph But You May Call Her Frank. The hook here, and it was a good one, is that we saw Francis (Frank) in three different eras. There were real song titles—Ephemera (the actual cards that replicated the menus) and What's on the Menu Today?, which needs no explanation. At one point, I wondered whether Frank was just a woman claiming to be a man in order to get in print. If the work is expanded, maybe we'll find out.

The Collector wasn't quite as effective. It dealt with a collector claiming the actual life source of a performer, while a journalist commented on it. Just a little too disjointed for me.

All About Mae was a wannabe story about a waitress-cum-singer preparing to wow Mae West at the supper club after Mae's performance of Sex (her play, not the actual act). Alas, Mae was carted off in a paddy-wagon and our songstress was left in the lurch.

Off to Love! featured Isadora Duncan being thrust into ancient Greece to choose between Eileithyia, Pheme, and Mania as goddess of the Parthenon (I'm not making this up, you know). Of course, Isadora's spiritual guide is Terpsichore. Guess who wins?

They saved (and so did I) the best for last, Check Out! has characters named Dewey, Dez, S Volume, Sci-Fi Paperback, and Toni Sexton. It all takes place in a library. In fact, it could be subtitled Library – The Musical! Dewey is an intern at the library whose goal in life is to be middle management. Dewey has never held a physical book in her life. Everyone is shocked. Dewey sings a blockbuster song—Middle, Middle Management. (This will be in NYC cabarets/piano bars very soon.) Dewey must choose a physical book. She eventually chooses Sci-Fi. He is over the moon—bad pun, I know, but that's the tone of this musical. Toni is the bad guy, writing his name in books with a Sharpie, and plastering his name all over buildings, but it doesn't really matter. The library is the good guy, and the winner.

ConcertMeister


Tuesday, February 11, 2025

Treasures of the High Baroque (2/6/25)

Gotham Early Music Scene
Jörg-Michael Schwarz ~ violin; Dongsok Shin ~ harpsichord 

Sonata per il Violino e Cembalo in G Major, BWV 1021 – J.S. Bach (1685–1750)
Adagio; Vivace; Largo; Presto

Sonata per il Violino e Cembalo in F Major, BWV 1022 – J.S. Bach
[Largo]; Allegro e presto; Adagio; Presto

Sonata in G minor del Signore Bach, BWV 1020 (formerly attributed to J.S. Bach) – C.P.E. Bach (1714–1788)
Allegro; Adagio; Allegro

Sonata No. 6 in G Major, BWV 1019 (ca. 1720) – J.S. Bach
Allegro; Largo; Cembalo solo Allegro; Adagio; Allegro

It was a wonderful concert. Both players are masters of their instruments. As you can see, all four works were very similar, so I'm going into teacher mode. Some of you may want to skip this part. Adagio = slowly (though not always somber). Vivace = brisk. Largo = slowly but maybe a little different from Adagio. Presto is more brisk than Vivace.

[Largo] has already been addressed, but I have no idea why the brackets were included in the second work on the program. Allegro e presto seems to be a hybrid Vivace. 

So far, the first two works were four movements each. It's a sort of a standard—until it isn't. The third work was three movements, which is also perfectly acceptable as sonata form.

So, of course, the fourth work had five movements. Is anyone confused yet? Suffice it to say that there were interesting situations where the harpsichord had a brief introduction before being joined by the violin. There were many instances where the two were equal partners. There was the cembalo (and as far as I can find, cembalo and harpsichord are interchangeable) solo movement in the fourth sonata. So, as much as the four works were alike, they were also slightly different. To me, that's a good thing.

Of note, the violin retuned to the harpsichord between each work, but not between individual movements. Hmm, the things that make me go hmm. Also of note (see the BWV listings above), I learned that BWV stands for Bach Werke Verzeichnis, Leipzig 1950; i.e., Complete Works of J.S. Bach. Which is probably why the C.P.E. Bach piece has a BWV number, since it was originally attributed to J.S.

Did I mention that the music was wonderful? And that the crowd was very appreciative? I'll be back (no, I am not going there) for more GEMS concerts.

ConcertMeister

Saturday, February 1, 2025

Passiones Animae ~ Parisian Sensibilities (1/23/25)

This concert was under the auspices of Gotham Early Music Scene.

Ela Kodzas, violin; Nuria Canales Rubio, flute; Ryan Cheng, violin & viola da gamba; Allen Maracle, violoncello; Nathan Mondry, harpsichord

Suite en trio No. 1 in G minor, from Livre de Simphonies, Op. 1 ~ Louis-Antoine Dornel (1680–1765) [six movements]

Sonata 4 in D minor from Sonates pour un flute traversière par accords ~ Joseph Bodin de Boismortier (1689–1755) [four movements]

Sonata No. 2 in D minor from Livre 3: Sonates pour le violoncelle ~ Jean Baptiste Barrière (1707–1747) [four movements]

Paris Quartet No. 4 in B minor from Nouveaux Quatuors ~ G.P. Telemann (1681–1767) [six movements]

Obviously, I'm not going to name every movement of every work—in fact, sometimes they sort of blended into one another. One caught my eye, however. The last movement of the Telemann – Meneuet – flipped with the fourth – Vite. I could only find Menuet as a spelling. But I digress.

The first work was for flute, violin, cello, and harpsichord. A note, here, the harpsichord was omnipresent, as continuo, though it was featured more fully a few times. Continuo sort of means always there, as a base for the work.

The second was for violin and flute. OK, I'll get these out of the way from the get go. All of the movements for all of the works included lively, calm, brisk but not frantic, dance-like in a genteel way, brighter, and fun, etc.

One of the works included viola da gamba and cello. As a result, all of the movements had a bit more heft, because of the presence of lower strings. But the flute was also there, to brighten things up.

The Telemann managed to skip the George/Georg quandary. By flipping the fourth and sixth movements, the ensemble ended up on a bright note. I imagine this type of thing also occurred regularly in the 1700s.

Three of the four composers were new to me, which is fairly rare. But I'm always happy to learn.

ConcertMeister