At the
Austrian Cultural Forum New York, this diverse program was performed
with only tenuous connections to Pierrot. The last work on the program was
Pierrot Lunaire, Op. 21 (1912) of Arnold Schoenberg (1874–1951). This was preceded by L’après-midi d’un Schoenberg (2012) by Richard Brooks (b. 1942) with libretto by Nancy Bogen (b. 1932) (World Premiere). And the concert opened with Danzón No. 2 (1994) by Arturo Márquez (b. 1950), (arr. by
Bobby Lapinski (b. 1989)). Whew! I think I’m done with diacriticals and parentheses. The entire concert was conducted by Dr. Arturo Ortega.
with only tenuous connections to Pierrot. The last work on the program was
Pierrot Lunaire, Op. 21 (1912) of Arnold Schoenberg (1874–1951). This was preceded by L’après-midi d’un Schoenberg (2012) by Richard Brooks (b. 1942) with libretto by Nancy Bogen (b. 1932) (World Premiere). And the concert opened with Danzón No. 2 (1994) by Arturo Márquez (b. 1950), (arr. by
Bobby Lapinski (b. 1989)). Whew! I think I’m done with diacriticals and parentheses. The entire concert was conducted by Dr. Arturo Ortega.
The
tenuous connection is the “Pierrot” Consort—four singers, flute, clarinet, violin,
cello and piano—essentially the forces for the Brooks work. And most of the
performers of the Brooks work have connections to the University of North Texas
College of Music. The only connection I made with the Márquez is that Mr.
Lapinski was the clarinetist in the “Pierrot” Consort. Clear as mud? Now, on to
the music.
Danzón
had a light tango feel, starting with piano and clarinet, then adding violin
and cello, and then the flute. With all instruments playing, there was a full
sound that picked up in tempo and volume. At one point the flutist doubled on
piccolo, adding to the intensity. I was reminded of the tangos of Astor
Piazzolla.
L’après-midi
d’un Schoenberg had an interesting concept in that it took four photographs of
Schoenberg and others (wife, child, two students, two unknown females) and
superimposed a “what-if” scenario. The photos were presumably taken by
Schoenberg’s brother, so we now have a cast of eight. As a result, our four
singers represented two people each, one with props (hats, lorgnette, hair bow)
and one without. An interesting concept that eventually fell a bit flat. The
mix of English and German texts was OK, and the material was presented in a way
that made it relatively understandable. The singing was uniformly good
throughout. Overall, an OK work that I would probably not seek out again.
The
same can pretty much be said for Pierrot Lunaire, a Sprechstimme song cycle of
three sets of seven songs each. The singer/actress here used a more fluid
(i.e., less jagged) interpretation of moving from pitch to pitch, which I found
to be an improvement over other interpretations of the style that I’ve heard. I
wasn’t overly impressed, but neither did I feel like sprinting from the room.
Once again, I’m glad I went. I wouldn’t seek these out again, and will look
more closely at ACFNY offerings before committing to attend. Hey, you can teach
old ’Meisters new tricks.
ConcertMeister
No comments:
Post a Comment